Blog number 11 Handmaiden's Tale

Hmmmm. This is the last blog post I have to write for this class.


The passage, or rather, passages I choose is how they outline the women's roles in society. I didn't like it. I bet that Mrs. Saunders didn't like it either. Really, any good, intelligent person would not like giving women set roles.

Here is an article about Sharia law, and here is another. What the articles describe is disgusting. The first one reports that Islamic states have rejected the UN's attempt to stop violence against women as it would violate their Sharia law. I find it hard to respect their Sharia law if it condone's violence against women, and I find it hard to respect those states if they abide by Sharia law. The second one describes how two teenage sisters and their mom were shot and killed for dancing in the rain. Seriously? It sounds like a sick joke. The two sisters and mom were dancing, a video of the dancing went viral, and so they were shot and killed. Apparently it violated the Sharia law. Hmmm. Further on in the article it reported that 77% of the people arrested for the murders in cases like this were acquitted.

The passage and articles are related in that they have laws that subjugate women. The passage is relevant to today's society because Sharia law still is in effect in many Islamic countries. And while in the U.S. we have no laws that discriminate against women there still is sexism.

Also, there is something that I noticed to. This book is obviously dystopic. It is dystopic in the United States though - Offred tried to escape with her daughter to Canada. It is dystopic due to the Religious law. And then in the real world most of the countries that are ruled under Sharia law (read: religious law) are not doing that hot either. Countries should not be ruled under religious law.

Blog 10 Handmaiden's Tale

The passage I chose was when the terrorist attack was described. The terrorist attack was done by a Christian group and it killed a lot of people.

The article that relates to the attack is this one. It is about how Anders Breivik killed 79 people in a terrorist attack in Norway. Lo and behold, Breivik is also Christian.

In the book, the group "Sons of Jacob" uses their terrorist attack to gain control of the United States. Not cool. It is obvious that they had bigger plans with their attack. Breivik, on the other hand, did not really want to accomplish much in conjunction with his attack. He did, however, have a "Manifesto" which he published online the day of his attacks. He didn't like Islam, he supported Zionism, and oh, look, he opposed Feminism. The group in the book were really mean to women and they took away their rights and generally degraded them. So there's another parallel.

This passage relates to the real world in that we still have terrorist attacks. Heck, we had the Boston Bombings not too long ago.

The passage also relates to the real world in that the Sons of Jacob framed the attacks on Islam. There is a lot of this today, this Islamophobia. If you read some of the comments on Fox News article online it is pretty disgusting. What I am saying is that the Sons of Jacob capitalized on society's collective Islamophobia to gain power over the United States. It seems farfetched, but there sure is a lot of Islam fear and hate today.

The passage is relevant to society today in that we still have terrorist attacks and we have Islamophobia.

Reflection on Children of Men

I liked this book. I am partial to the "band of survivors" type of Dystopias. While the 5 Fishes weren't the only survivors in the whole world, they are the book's "band of survivors."

First off, this is one of the scariest types of dystopias/apocalypses. If everyone were infertile then we would all die out within 100 years. However, if we had access to fertile sperm we could prolong our race for a bit longer. If it happened now we could still get sperm from fertility clinics and sperm banks. That wouldn't last us too long. With nowaday's technology scientists would most likely be able to grow people. Or grow sperm cells. Scientists in Japan have recently grown a mouse from a drop of blood. Neat stuff.

Buuuuut this happened in 1994. We wouldn't have had the technology back then.

There is something that kinda is annoying me though. It seems that their society is pretty darned orderly. I just don't see how there can be something so catastrophic and there not just be a massive upheaval of society. I don't think that humans have the capacity to come together after something that big, especially if after they died there would be no more people to live on earth. Hell, if that happened I would probably riot, then move out to the countryside and fend for myself.

The idea of the Omegas is pretty weird. I don't like how they received special attention and were buttheads about it. Also, I don't really understand the concept of a "generation." Where is the cutoff? I know that there was the Baby Boomer generation, and their kids were a generation, but doesn't that generation line get blurred along the way? Anyway, I didn't like the Omega's status.

This was a pretty good book overall.

Blog Number 8

The passage I choose from Life As We Knew It is when the family and their neighbor go to the stores and buy as much as they can.

The article that relates to the passage is this one. The article is about how 42 million people died in the bloodiest Black Friday on record. I know it is satire, but it shows that Black Friday is getting more and more hectic as the years go by. I have never participated in it, but I kind of want to so I can elbow people and get deals. Ha.

The relation between the passage and the article is that they both have people rushing to the stores, sometimes foregoing unwritten social rules to get what they want. In the book's case, the people were willing to spend as much as they needed to get things that they needed. In the article's case, people were trying to spend as little as needed to get things they wanted. In the book, the mom threw down money at the cashier and did not care what the goods costed, but in the article Black Friday patrons are there to specifically save money.

In the book people fight over goods in the store. It makes sense; lives are at stake. If that happened in real life you bet your butt that I would be duking it out with the elderly to get more food. In the article people are fighting over goods as well. However, there is not a need for the goods. The people fight because they can save money.

In both situations people's tribal tendencies come to the surface. In the first situation, EVERYONE needs to get food and supplies. That it is everyone engenders the fighting. If only one person needed to get food and supplies he would not go around fighting. In the article, EVERYONE is getting a good deal. If only one person got great deals, there would be no fighting.

When everyone has to do something, or there is some incentive, people's true nature comes out and violence happens. Boo violence.

Final Exam Blog

For my final exam I read A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess. It was an amazing read. I grew attached to Alex, the protagonist, as the story progressed; I was extremely attached at the end of the book even though it was  just about 200 pages long.

The first thing that struck me about this book was the "nadsat," a type of slang spoken by the Humble Narrator and the youth of the book. The first chapter was hard to get through, but as the book progressed I learned the slang and it made the book a lot more fun. I think the slang served three purposes. The first, and most superficial, purpose was just to make the book more fun to read. Learning new words is fun, at least to smart, awesome people. The second purpose is to immerse the reader in the dystopian world of the book. If it were written in normal English then it would have been harder to believe it were a dystopia. The slang makes it as if the Humble Narrator was regaling us with this story. The third purpose was hard to catch, but it really is effective. When Alex is unconditioned and is "ultra-violent" he speaks in the slang. When he gets conditioned by the government he changes to a "proper" way of speaking. Then when the conditioning is reversed he reverts back to the slang. Atta boy, Alex.

I would have to say the next thing that struck me was the ultra-violence. Alex and his gang are teens and they are beating people up on the street, raping people, and Alex killed a woman. In the beginning of the story the balance of power leans towards the gangs; they rape, steal, and assault while the police do not do much. At the end of the story Alex mentions how the ultra-violence has gone down and suggests the possible reason of the police getting a lot more violent. This lends to the government being the cause of the dystopia in this story. Either the government doesn't do its job and the ultra-violence is perpetrated by the gangs or the gangs die down and the government commits the violence. Burgess here might be commenting that there is always going to be violence one way or another, it is like the Law of Conservation of Violence. Burgess exaggerates the violence to make his commentary clearer.

The last thing that was important to me was Alex's prison time and his conditioning. In the prison pre-conditioning Alex is still violent - he and some cellmates kill a man, with Alex delivering the killing blow. It is obvious that Alex isn't changed at all. Then, when Alex is forcibly conditioned he becomes a polar opposite of his former self: sniveling at the feet of someone who is threatening him, and licking the feet of a good looking devotchka. What we see here are the opposite sides of a spectrum. When the person in jail has no government interaction or help they do not get better. But when they are completely forced into "getting help" they are no better than without the governments help. I think Burgess is saying that we shouldn't just toss prisoners in jail nor should we condition them too harshly. We need to find that sweet spot to make them a better person while still making sure that they know they did something wrong.


I really liked this book. I don't know if I should recommend the movie; I haven't scene it. That being said, I don't know if I should watch the movie. In Burgess' introduction he explains how he wrote the book with 21 chapters, and that the book makes sense if you read them all. It certainly made sense to me. Burgess goes on to explain that the first prints of his book did not have the 21st chapter - the publishing companies left it out. The movie was then made without the 21st chapter and Burgess explains that there is definitely a different feeling in the movie than from the full book. Oh well.

I would give this book a 10/10. Books are awesome.

Best/Scariest Dystopian Novel, and Most Likely Scenario

I think the best dystopian novel that I have read is One Second After by William R. Forstchen. It also happens to be the scariest dystopian novel I have read as well. The premise of the book is that an EMP hit the United States and every piece of electronics were fried. All communication is cut, all refrigeration, everything. The book chronicles a family's struggle to survive in a small town.

This is the best dystopian novel for a few reasons. It is really nicely written, has a plausible, relatable scenario, and is scary.

 - The book is easy to read and I couldn't put it down. That makes it good.
 - The scenario is easy to relate to. When the power goes out we think its fun. But then we go to use the computer... and we can't. We go to turn on the lights in the bathroom... and we can't. We go to use thr fridge... and its warm. Almost everything that we use in our life is reliant on electronic workings.

 - That is what makes it scary. We can't imagine a world without electronics. Our cars wouldn't work. Planes would drop out of the sky. Phones would not work. Pretty much nothing would work. Some of this might not sound that scary, like all "ooh it's like camping!" but the main character in the book has a son who need to take insulin. And insulin needs to be refrigerated. And refrigeration requires electricity. Almost the entire second half of the book is the main character racing to save his son from dying.

I think that the most likely dystopian scenario is a biological one. I think that some pthogen is going to be produced in a lab somewhere and sweep through the world, killing and infecting billions of people. In our world this would be relatively easy to accomplish with all the connections people have. A man can wake up in China, eat lunch in Europe, and go to bed in Brazil. The pathogen would be able to spread like wildfire. I think that this is the most likely scenario.

I don't think that a corporate or goverment dystopia is even possible. As we have seen in the Middle East in the past few year, people will revolt if there is something they don't like. People revolt against goverments, strike against corporations, and boycott corporations as well. The only way that government or corporate dystopias would work is through brainwashing.

And speaking of brainwashing, how about religion? HAHAHAHAHAHA. But seriously though a religious dystopia would not work because a religion needs to reach a critical mass of followers to become powerful enough to warrant a dystopia. Recent polls show that religion is declining and atheism is on the rise. If that trend continues our world will be a much better place HAHAHAHAHA JOKING JUST KIDDING. But seriously if that trend continues the chances of a religious dystopia will decrease. This article has more on the subject.

                                           Drop in Religiosity Index

Country 2005 2012 % change in Religiosity

Global Average 77% 68% -9

%

Vietnam 53%

30% -23%

Ireland 69%

47% -22%

Switzerland 71

% 50% -21%

France 58

% 37% -21%

South Africa 83

% 64% -19%

Iceland 74

% 57% -17%

Ecuador 85

% 70% -15%

United States 73

% 60% -13%

Canada 58

% 46% -12%

Austria 52

% 42% -10%

Resist or Embrace the Feed

I think you should resist the feed. Just like that. The reason for this is that there will inevitably be a virus that will be able to infect the feed.

Viruses travel over the internet and it is obvious that the feed connects to and uses the internet. Therefore it is just a matter of time until a virus is made to infect the feed.

It was shown in the nightclub how the feed already has "virus" capabilities. The police, or whoever the authority is, come and basically turn the ruffians off. I don't want to have something in my head that gives others that capability.

Also, the feed in the novel has advertisements out the wazoo, and there is no real way to turn off those advertisements. Think about how annoying that would be, having advertisements whizzing around your mind, with no way to turn them off. You know how when you surf the internet and then suddenly a site starts playing an add WITH SOUND and you have no idea which tab/site it is and you are frantically switching from tab to tab yelling SHUT IT OFF SHUT IT OFF? Imagine that, but in your mind.

The only way that you could ever convince me to use the Feed would be that
       
 - A. My Feed could never ever get a virus and would never ever be affected by things outside my head i.e. the police.
 - B. My Feed could surf the internet freely.
 - C. My Feed would never get ads. I would see ads on the internet of course, but would not see ads directly beamed to my feed.
 - D. I could turn off and on the Feed freely.

Basically the only way I would ever let the Feed into my head was that if it was completely 100% mine and would never be affected by any outside things.

In summation I would resist the Feed as it is presented in the book, but would accept a Feed with stringent guidelines.